000 | 02005cam a22003611i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c2009 _d2009 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230414150109.0 | ||
008 | 180126s20182018nyu b 001 0 eng c | ||
020 |
_a9780465097609 _q(hardcover) |
||
020 |
_a046509760X _q(hardcover) |
||
020 |
_z9780465097616 _q(ebook) |
||
020 |
_z0465097618 _q(ebook) |
||
040 |
_aOU/DLC _beng _cOU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aPearl, Judea, _94842 |
|
110 |
_aMackenzie, Dana _97117 |
||
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe book of why: _bthe new science of cause and effect |
250 | _aFirst edition. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aNew York : _bBasic Books, _c2018. |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2018 | |
300 |
_ax, 418 pages ; _c25 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 |
_a"Everyone has heard the claim, "Correlation does not imply causation." What might sound like a reasonable dictum metastasized in the twentieth century into one of science's biggest obstacles, as a legion of researchers became unwilling to make the claim that one thing could cause another. Even two decades ago, asking a statistician a question like "Was it the aspirin that stopped my headache?" would have been like asking if he believed in voodoo, or at best a topic for conversation at a cocktail party rather than a legitimate target of scientific inquiry. Scientists were allowed to posit only that the probability that one thing was associated with another. This all changed with Judea Pearl, whose work on causality was not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
650 | 0 |
_aCausation. _96991 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aInference. _96992 |
|
856 |
_3Authors' webpage _uhttp://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/WHY/ |
||
856 |
_3Publisher's webpage _uhttps://www.basicbooks.com/titles/judea-pearl/the-book-of-why/9780465097616/ |
||
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2JEL _cBO |