000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
01991nam a2200217Ia 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
DE-boiza |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20200120085538.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
191008 |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
International Standard Book Number |
0-88099-157-7 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Transcribing agency |
IZA |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
Bell, Stephen H |
9 (RLIN) |
3856 |
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Program Applicants as a Comparison Group in Evaluating Training Programs: Theory and Test |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
1995 |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
Kalamazoo, Mich., |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
Extent |
183 pages |
340 ## - PHYSICAL MEDIUM |
Location within medium |
C5 07 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc. |
The authors begin with a thorough assessment of the many nonexperimental employment and training program evaluation techniques based on non-random comparison groups. These techniques typically use econometric methods to estimate the effects of employment and training programs by using comparison groups from non-program "external" sources. Then, recognizing the inherent drawbacks in these methods, Bell, Orr, Blomquist and Cain respond by reintroducing an evaluation method first implemented in the 1960s, the use of "internal" comparison groups consisting of nonparticipating program applicants. These groups include withdrawals, screen-outs and no-shows of the programs being evaluated in order to solve the selection bias problem. By applying to the program, say the authors, nonparticipating applicants reveal themselves to have some of the same difficult-to-measure, personal characteristics that inspire participants to seek help in response to their current economic situation. The methodology of this technique is updated, then tested against the random experimental findings derived from a controlled job training experiment, the AFDC Homemaker-Home Health Aide Demonstrations. Encouraging results are presented along with useful suggestions for designers and implementers of all types of program evaluations. |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
training programs |
9 (RLIN) |
6556 |
|
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
evaluation |
9 (RLIN) |
1519 |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=up_press">https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=up_press</a> |
Link text |
Full-text |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Koha item type |
Monography |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|