Program Applicants as a Comparison Group in Evaluating Training Programs: Theory and Test (Record no. 1363)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01991nam a2200217Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field DE-boiza
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20200120085538.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 191008
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 0-88099-157-7
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency IZA
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Bell, Stephen H
9 (RLIN) 3856
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Program Applicants as a Comparison Group in Evaluating Training Programs: Theory and Test
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1995
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research,
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Kalamazoo, Mich.,
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 183 pages
340 ## - PHYSICAL MEDIUM
Location within medium C5 07
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The authors begin with a thorough assessment of the many nonexperimental employment and training program evaluation techniques based on non-random comparison groups. These techniques typically use econometric methods to estimate the effects of employment and training programs by using comparison groups from non-program "external" sources. Then, recognizing the inherent drawbacks in these methods, Bell, Orr, Blomquist and Cain respond by reintroducing an evaluation method first implemented in the 1960s, the use of "internal" comparison groups consisting of nonparticipating program applicants. These groups include withdrawals, screen-outs and no-shows of the programs being evaluated in order to solve the selection bias problem. By applying to the program, say the authors, nonparticipating applicants reveal themselves to have some of the same difficult-to-measure, personal characteristics that inspire participants to seek help in response to their current economic situation. The methodology of this technique is updated, then tested against the random experimental findings derived from a controlled job training experiment, the AFDC Homemaker-Home Health Aide Demonstrations. Encouraging results are presented along with useful suggestions for designers and implementers of all types of program evaluations.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element training programs
9 (RLIN) 6556
Topical term or geographic name entry element evaluation
9 (RLIN) 1519
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=up_press">https://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=up_press</a>
Link text Full-text
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Monography
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Library Library 2019-10-08 C5 07 93118 2019-10-08 2019-10-08 Monography
Deutsche Post Stiftung
 
Istitute of Labor Economics
 
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
 

Powered by Koha